Wednesday, 23 December 2009

Intermission



Season's greetings. Remember, it won't last long.
Εύχομαι σε όλους καλές γιορτές και χρόνια πολλά.

Sunday, 20 December 2009

A Cautionary Tale...

...from the Daily Mail


Gareth Thomas is a ‘sporting legend’ who shocked the world rigid the other day. The Mail Online has the headline:
British Lions rugby legend Gareth Thomas: 'It's ended my marriage and nearly driven me to suicide. Now it's time to tell the world the truth - I'm gay.
Broken marriage, thoughts of ending it all, the truth out at last: FeMail is getting into some of its favourite stuff here, so get yourselves sat comfy and reach for the Kleenex. By all means feel compassion for Thomas - while not necessarily condoning his actions, of course – for Gareth and pretty wife Gemma have been on an emotional rollercoaster, a soul-searching ride to hell and back. It’s also a timely wake up call to us all, a warning of what widespread homosexualism could do to our society, one which we ignore at our peril.

If, like me, you had never heard of Gareth Thomas, here is the Mail’s introduction: ‘With 100 caps to his name - more than any other player in Welsh history - he has one of the fiercest reputations on the field, and a row of missing front teeth to prove it. At 6ft 3in and 16st of pure muscle, his masculinity has always been an absolute given.’ But how are the mighty fallen, because ‘it was all a pretence, a fragile artifice - and one which came crashing down around his ears on November 4, 2006, following a Wales game in Cardiff.’

What happened??? Did Gareth admit that he wasn’t six foot three after all? No. He was forced to acknowledge that he really liked men, to reveal that long-hidden gay secret from deep inside that had been a tight, ticking knot of a time-bomb threatening to seep out of his innermost stomach and destroy him for living a tissue of lies. 'It felt as if I had a devil on one shoulder and an angel on the other.’ When matters all came rushing finally to an ultimate head, his devastated wife crumbled, and they both split up and fell apart. All this, after their fairy tale wedding in the pretty village of St Brides Major, and the heartbreak of several miscarriages. After twenty years of standing on cliff edges, dipping a toe into the water and wondering whether or not to jump off, Gareth has now taken the plunge and come out as a pouf. 'I've been through all sorts of emotions with this, tears, anger and absolute despair,' he says. He is still ‘consumed with guilt,’ whilst nonetheless happy to be ‘single and free to date whomever he pleases without fear of being 'outed'. He says he feels like a teenager again, re-living his youth, discovering who he really is.’

Heed then the Mail’s cautionary tale of Gareth Thomas, a man given to unnatural desires, one who took the momentous decision to indulge them.  He at least is happy now, having reverted to being a teenager again. Don't they always say homosexuality is caused by arrested development? Think of his wife, of the family that might have been, and ponder, deep in your heart, the wisdom of his choice. If only he had been straight, and left his wife for another woman like a normal bloke.

*****

I always thought my masculinity was an absolute given too. I’m not six foot three or sixteen stone of muscle, but I have XY chromosomes, a dick, balls and a hairy chest, and was under the impression that I met all the requirements. I was born with them (apart from the hairy chest) and the fact that sexually I only like men seemed to me irrelevant to my masculinity. So I too have been living a lie!

For the Daily Mail readers' info, I have had it off with three prop forwards, and am able to confirm that gay rugby players are not especially rare. Most rugby players are comfortable enough in their maleness not to give a monkey's in any case. See this NSFW link if you don't believe me, and if you don't mind a bit of cock. Good luck to Gareth Thomas, and fuck the Daily Mail.

Friday, 18 December 2009

Off Shop





Christmas came early this year. The snow buggered up the trains, so I called the university and said I wouldn’t be in today. It was only a half day in any case. Few if any students would have shown, all my admin was in order, so after calling I went back to bed with a coffee and gave the place no further thought. For fourteen days, it does not exist.
 
So there.

Later, I crunched through the snow to Waitrose, now full of uniformed twinks stacking shelves as fast as Christmas shoppers can ransack them. I remembered my summer and Christmas job back in 1978 in a wine shop in Huddersfield. There my page-boy haired, twinky self unloaded boxes, stacked shelves, and God fucking help us, advised customers.

I had just returned to England after six months in France and considered myself pretty wine-savvy. It never occurred to me that drinking wine in quantity did not in itself confer expertise, and that ‘piss-head’ is not a synonym of ‘master of wine’. But, you know, in 1970s Huddersfield, it might as well have been. We were, generally speaking, as alcoholically unsophisticated as aborigines.

Wine terminology scared people. An elderly lady stood baffled before a wall of sherry bottles before asking me ‘am’t yer got any sweet sherry, love? I can only see ‘cream’ here.’ The identical problem oppressed a bloke who was obviously looking for a present for a lady. ‘Is yer dry Martini sweet?’ he asked me, with the same sotto, confidential tone a man might use to ask another if he has a spare condom. Oh, the temptation. I was going to say ‘I sincerely hope not,’ but bottled out.

A wine shop naturally attracts winos – why else would I have been working there, after all – and we had our regular piss-heads. Look, I’m sorry, stereotyping and all that, but our regular drunks were all Irish. Their preferred tipple was Strongbow cider and this we kept at the front of the long-by-narrow shop, otherwise they would pocket miniatures of whisky as they searched down the far end for ‘The Bow’. It was their custom to pay in very small coin, so vigilance had to be exercised when one of them was counting out sixty pence worth of halfpennies at the till, as his mates might be circulating and prestidigitating cans into their macs while the check-out lady was watching the grubby coin counter and holding her breath against the smell of piss. One day, a gentleman wino was a few pence short of a two-litre bottle of Bow, and said he would ask his mate in the nearby churchyard to make up the shortfall so long as he could take the bottle with him as proof of purchase. The manageress would have none of this, and the gentleman took this want of trust very much amiss.

‘YER’LL DOY DE SAME AS OI WILL!’ he said, in capital letters, pointing at her from the doorway.

‘Aye, but I’m going where it’s nice!’

A loud lady came and hollered ‘Ave yer got some wine called Pie and Peas? My mate adsum an she reckons it’s fair right nice.’

Madam refers no doubt to Piesporter. We do indeed keep it, and it is fair right nice, as madam's 'mate' avers.

*****

Some mean-spirited company rule deprived me of a small amount of money, and in retaliation I helped myself to four cans of Carlsberg Special Brew. Spot-checks on staff bags were permitted. Nobody checked mine. My mother was horrified when I brandished the cans in triumph, and she refused to accept my contention that they were taken in righteous protest against the stingy refusal to pay twinky employees for their breaks.

Anyway, now you know, Lodge Wines, so come and get me.



Incidentally, why in England are we never prepared for snow? Every year it takes us by surprise, and transport is screwed for three or four days. In all my fifteen years in Greece, I saw snow only three times. Indeed it is so rare that to describe an event as san ta hionia, 'like the snows', is to say that it hardly ever happens. Nevertheless, when it snowed, everyone was ready. Gritters were out, chains were secured around tyres and everybody was dressed as for a skiing trip. Within hours the dusting of snow would have evaporated, and all the accoutrements put away for another five years. What Athens never seemed to come to grips with was rain. In winter it regularly pisses down for hours at a stretch, and cars float down flooded streets like logs on a river. Nobody seemed to think anything could be done about this, yet everyone was ready for a once-in-a-blue-moon flurry of snow. Weird.



View from my window this morning

Thursday, 17 December 2009

Heavenly Revelations


 

Sayeed did a fair bit of witnessing for Allah in the one-to-one lessons we had together. IELTS reading and essay construction were put aside as he tried to persuade me of the wisdom of the Quran. I could never get him to condemn the slaughter of three thousand people in the attacks on the World Trade Center, or the killing of fifty two people and injury of some seven hundred more in London bombings, but had to sit smiling and nodding as he went on about Allah’s concern for the health of the body.

‘God assek you, why you will drink wine?' he told me earnestly. 'He assek, what for you will drink allah-co-hol? You should not: why you should not? Is bad for you body, make harm you liffer. This why is forbidded, you see?’ he’d smile brightly, pleased at the irrefutable logic of the prohibition. This was the stick, and there was an accompanying carrot. ‘In Baradise, is have wine! In Baradise, wine don’t make hurt you liffer, so why to drink wine here?’

I didn’t get to reply before he gave me twenty minutes on the rivers of wine, milk and honey that flow through Jannah, O wond'rous to behold. As I half listened, I felt like objecting that I could get all this from Sainsbury’s on the way home, so why wait for the last trump? However, given what he was telling me and clearly believed, irony would most probably be quite lost on him. What’s wrong with you people who still believe this crap, I wondered, as he dilated on the topic. This is a fantasy evolved by people of the desert who suffered thirst, hunger, heat, pain, labour. You live with comforts they could never have dreamed of, sunshine. How long would it be before you were sated to vomiting with the milk, wine and honey, sore from knobbing your seventy-odd virgins, bored senseless with the rest and ease of your elevated couch? Wouldn’t oblivion be preferable?

Mary Katherine Baxter can claim to be a better guide to heaven than Sayeed, because she's actually been there. Top that! The boss’s son, Jesus, took her to hell for thirty nights and it wasn’t at all nice, but in compensation for witnessing the torture of the damned, Mary got ten nights in Heaven, half board. You can watch Mary Katherine telling Sid Somebodyorother about her time in Paradise in the video below, which is, ummm, unbelievable. Notable is the Lord’s love of music, especially when performed in His praise. Up there, Mary saw ‘a piano forty feet across, and a trumpet thirty- five feet long,’ and people dancing together to music of all nations. You Tubers have appended their comments to this video and it is surprising that they greet her revelations with such awe and reverence. I mean, you abjured all the Kingdoms of the world, and this is your reward: a thirty-five foot trumpet. Well done, thou good and faithful servant! Among the happily dancing throng that Mary saw, perhaps some were rather wishing they had spent a bit more time actually fornicating rather than slapping down their natural urges. Or maybe not. Maybe entering heaven has the same effect as a lobotomy. After all, you could not enjoy this unending kiddie’s birthday party if you were at all intelligent, or wistful about what you could have done, or agonising over the torment of your unsaved friends and family members being spit-roasted down in the other place.

Paradise as envisaged by Islam and Pentecostal christers is notable chiefly for it’s tawdriness and sheer bloody tedium; the same viscous, vacuous nauseating jollity that is about to be ladled all over us next week, unless we make a special effort to avoid it, which I shall. The first sickly dribbles have been in evidence for some weeks now, but the full, sweet, gloopy chunder is yet to come. Imagine if it lasted for ever.



Wednesday, 9 December 2009

Come again?




This morning I taught a load of vocabulary pertaining to food and restaurants. After, the students were given a set of questions each to ask a partner. In the course of this activity I was called over by Khalid and Nabil to resolve a misunderstanding.

'I'm ask he,' Khalid said with the deliberateness of one resigned to being often misunderstood, 'what your favourity wedge-table and frewit?'

'Vegetable and fruit, yeah,' I nod seriously, in acknowledgement of a point well made.

'Yes. I'm ask he, what your favourity wedge-table and frewit, and he say me...'

'Pins and crap,' said Nabil, defensively.

Khalid looked at me and shrugged. 

'Pins and crap!!!' said Nabil, louder, rattled at being required to state and restate the blindingly obvious. Then seeing he wasn't taking us with him, he rifled through the course book to find the words in print.

'Shuf!* Pins and crap, here.'

Ah, yes, beans and grapes. I see. 

*****


*shuf  'look' in Arabic. 

Monday, 7 December 2009

How do I bug thee? Let me count the ways




If you are a student looking for a foolproof way of getting up a teacher’s nose, let me recommend ‘Telling Him How To Do His Job'. This is especially irritating if you, as a student, are a teacher in your own country. You can tell your teacher how you do things there, and compare his approach unfavourably. Never mind if you teach physics and know diddly squat about language teaching – all the better to piss him off. More tried and trusted ways are offered below.

  1. Sit sulking in silence for most of the lesson, then well over half way through, complain that you are not being allowed enough opportunity to speak. Point out that in your country, the teacher has students read aloud around the class, thus affording everyone the opportunity to drone a few lines of text while everybody else either scans the page to calculate which bit he will be required to read, or nods off. You should be prepared for the usual teacherly nonsense that reading aloud is not something most people are called upon to do in ‘real life’, that it is quite possible to read aloud without understanding a word, and that it is mostly pretty sort of pointless, really. Dismiss such objections. You didn’t scrape pre-intermediate level by the age of thirty-five in Libya by speaking spontaneously, did you? Well, then.
  2. If your teacher, mindful of your previous objection, brings in a poem or a dialogue for reading aloud, pull a face. Object that poems and dialogues are only used for kiddies in your country. Bear in mind that he will have excuses, as ever; poems are written to be read aloud, whereas editorials from The Independent usually are not. A dialogue has potential for some entertaining work on stress and intonation that The Economist entirely lacks. Have none of this. Are you not an economist? In seminars you will want to bore everybody into catatonia by reading aloud ad mispronounced, mind-numbing nauseam, as you would back home.
  3. There’s a kind of English language teacher that will work very hard to draw you into conversation by forever eliciting your views and encouraging you to elaborate on them. You’ll recognise the type: Alexander Technique poise, perpetual inviting smile, eyebrows arched encouragingly. Usually perches on the front desk, bright eyes trawling the room. Watch that taut bod sag like a dead octopus on the dot of 2.45! Until then, respond costively. Allow the ingratiating pillock to ply you with questions for about half the lesson before flouncing out, huffing that you came here to learn English, not have conversations!
  4. Wait until your teacher has spent a good fifteen minutes leading into a reading text, teaching relevant vocabulary, trying hard to engage your interest, striving to relate the topic of the text as much as possible to your experience in order that you might know the satisfaction of successful comprehension... ah, just watch the poor sap try… then say ‘yes, but I sink phrasal verbs are more important dan such tings.’ The counsel of perfection here is for you to be a pernickety, clench-sphinctered Swiss banker of twenty-five going on fifty, and say ‘Freissl Wurbs’. How your teacher will want to gob you one!

Happy aggravation!

Saturday, 5 December 2009

???



I've noticed that comments are disappearing from this blog, or that the number given below the post does not always tally with the actual number of comments. Some of my own comments have vanished from other blogs I follow. So, man, I'm like, WTF, innit, you get me?

It seems that Blogger have this down as a 'known issue' and are trying to sort it out. Meanwhile if any of your astute observations or witty ripostes has slipped through a hole in cyber space, it's Blogger's fault, not mine. I haven't censored them.

I noted also that the 'reactions' feature is wonky as well, with the numbers of 'funny' and 'interesting' ticks dwindling on some posts. A shameless tick whore, I was really pissed off about that.

Friday, 4 December 2009

If You Fancy Some Pussy...

Under my crusty exterior, beneath my irrascibility and misanthropy, there beats a heart of the purest blancmange. For me this video is (just short of) a minute's worth of bliss, reminding me poignantly of my cat William, who departed this life a year ago this day, age 17 years. I know cats are no-good, wheedling manipulators, that they are horrible to mice, or in William's case to Greek cockroaches, and that they are total control freaks. Your dog will adore you if you provide him with food and affection. Your cat will take the food and affection as no more than his due. The dog will think you are God, and the cat conclude that he must be God. Despite this appalling presumption, I delight in every sound and movement of a contented feline. You can please yourselves.

Monday, 30 November 2009

Then it Must be True




The subject of alternative medicine arose with my Algerian group today. Most had not heard of acupuncture or aromatherapy, and this is no great loss if you ask me, but they all extolled the benefits of cupping. In my ignorance, I thought this practice had been ditched somewhere around the time when the phlogiston theory of combustion went out of favour, but the students put me right. It draws out bad blood, they said, and is of especial benefit at full moon. It’s scientifically proven by the United States Institute for Proving Stuff and anyway, the Prophet (PBUH) says it works, so there’s an end of it.

I found this on a ‘Muslim health’ website this evening: ‘70% of diseases, pains and ailments are due to the blood being unable to reach certain parts of the body. Dry cupping (hijama) and dry massaging cupping allow the blood to reach these places.’ I don’t know where the 70% figure comes from. Maybe that is in the Quran as well. Also, 50% of people with high blood pressure will benefit from cupping performed on a Tuesday, while type 2 diabetics are better dressed and should take up an offer coming their way midweek.



Cupping draweth ill humours from the bodie; it putteth away ſlothe and ſuch ills as proceed of moiſt and windie cauſes. It afrighteth boggarts, and layeth ghoſtes of them that die in childe bed. It is of merveylous benefit to the ſhins, likewiſe to the great toe.



Arabic is the World’s Most Difficult Language, a Libyan student told me. I started to point out the very, very bloody obvious fact that difficulty in language learning is in the eye of the beholder. Oh, for fuck’s sake, it doesn’t take a genius… if the language you purpose to learn is very similar to your own, you are probably going to find it easier than one that is very different. Many a Chinese student has enrolled for three months in a British language school and worked his bollocks off, only to find that he has made less progress at the end of his stay than the little clique of Poles in the same class who spent the three months merely arsing about. When someone comes up with the ‘mine is the most difficult language’ rubbish, I usually suggest they have a go at learning Inuktitut, whilst struggling to bear in mind that any native speaker of that tongue finds it as easy as breathing. I didn’t get that far today. With Naima looking on and nodding approval, Abdulkarim insisted that this was not merely his opinion: it was in the Quran. Once again, there was an end of it.

When I got home I flopped in front of the computer and pulled up You Tube. Someone at You Tube must have known what sort of a day I’d had. Among the videos recommended for me was the one below, the first of two, in which Matt Dillahunty of The Atheist Experience attempts, with slowly dwindling patience, to get a sincere but uncomplicated Christian lady to justify her beliefs. She simply doesn’t understand what he's driving at, and states and restates that she believes because she believes. In the end he pulls the plug on her, something I cannot do with my students. I just have to smile and think ‘don’t get involved’. 

I would not show such forbearance with a Christian student. A Christian would at least be used to disagreement and have a few counter arguments rehearsed. Much as I would like to call overseas Muslim students out on their blind obedience to the Quran now and again, I can't, or they will simply complain that they are being attacked and disrespected, and probably take their custom elsewhere. The university would not be at all pleased about that.

You might like to read The Heresiarch here A quote: 'Karen Armstrong... is as unshakeably certain that God is "compassion" as any Taliban commander is convinced that God wants to stone adulterers. She is just as convinced as he is that God agrees with her point of view.'


Saturday, 28 November 2009

And It Was Such a Lovely Old Word, Too...



Seen on 'Sissydude' - see sidebar for link.

Senator Stevie Speaks Out



Senator Steve Fielding of Australia is not in favour of gay marriage. Stevie is the leader of the Family First party, which exists to protect this fragile and endangered institution. Woofters and dykes obviously have no place in the party because they have no families - as is well known, they are created on other planets by some mysterious agamogenesis and then beamed down from alien spacecraft to lurk among us. They masquerade as human beings whilst ceaselessly hatching godless plots to destroy masculinity, marriage and family, and everything that you and I hold sacred. Fact: every time two arse-bandits are permitted to tie the knot, four hundred and seventy three straight couples file for divorce as a direct consequence. This in turn leads to binge drinking, erectile dysfunction, child abuse, increased use of the word ‘fuck’ on the telly, and Gok Wan.

But why are you listening to me? Senator Steve is a master rhetorician, and he puts the case against same-sex marriage far more eloquently and elegantly than I could hope to:

''A bloke cannot marry his brother; it is not right. A woman cannot marry their sister; it is not right. A bloke cannot marry a bloke because it is not right, and a female cannot marry a female because it is not right. I don't support this.''
Pwned, all you supporters of Godless faggotry!

*****

Hat tip to the Reverend Ackeroff

Wednesday, 25 November 2009

Huh?



Testing time again. Part of the test had questions on sports vocabulary. The students were given sentences such as the following:
Our school has just got a fantastic new football p...............
and invited to fill the gap. The expected answers here, of course, are pitch or player. I can't, off hand, think of any other words that would do, and certainly not ones that would be known to the group I teach. Therefore I am puzzled as to what Yasmina had in mind when she filled the gap thus:
Our school has just got a fantastic new football pispot.

Suggestions welcome.

Rollcall

Not my habitual classroom manner, this, but one I am sometimes tempted to adopt.

Tuesday, 17 November 2009

Gurus, Twerps and Huggy Bears




I have recently found the blog of The TEFL Tradesman, and reading him and his debunking of TEFL-oid softness in the head has reminded me of the kind of Teaching English as a Foreign Language woo-woo that my present job protects me from. For instance, between January 8th and March 2nd 2007 in Vermont, you could have done this course for teachers, had you been present. (Otherwise, let’s face it, you couldn’t have.)


Being Present: The Key to Seeing, Accepting and Understanding
This course explores what it means to be present, the impact being present can have on any situation or relationship, and the skills we need to develop to be more present in our work. The major focus of the course is the experiential application of presence within our work context. Through reflection we examine how presence or lack of presence influences the situations and relationships of our context. We also share insights into what supports us to be present in the moment or what is missing when we are not present. A selection of reading assignments support the experiential and reflective work

It may seem perverse to share this with you now that the course is over and done with, but I do feel we all might still derive profit from reflecting dynamically on how our absence from this course has affected our lives and those of the people around us. In what way – or indeed ways – has my being nowhere near the venue in Vermont impacted those to whom I am a teacher, a brother, a son, a good customer for Johnny Walker Black, or that shady figure from the upstairs flat? Fact: I was not there. Recognizing this as a reality situation, how has my life developed from that point? In what ways, what directions, have I grown as a sentient being following my absence from this event?

This sort of arrant twaddle is the teaching equivalent of reiki and aromatherapy, and people who get bored senseless with presenting the Present Continuous over and over are sometimes tempted to become practitioners. In Greece in the nineties it was easy to become a TEFL guru. As the Greeks say; ‘είσαι ο, τι δηλώνεις’ - you are whatever you announce yourself to be. Have a set of business cards printed that say you are a teacher trainer, and immediately that’s what you are. People who methodologically didn't know their arse from a hole in the ground, and who would not soil their hands in a classroom full of testosterone-crazed teenage boys would give - nay, vouchsafe - seminars on allegedly up-to-the minute TEFL methodology and fall prey to the allure of being big fish in a small pond. This condition (which I have termed microlimnic ichthyomegaly) is characterized by belief in one’s own press, a deep love of the sound of one’s own voice and an attitude of unbearable patronage to anyone on the shop-floor. The bona fide teacher trainers all got lumped in with the wannabes in the minds of teachers and school owners.

TEFL gurus tend to go for ‘humanistic’ methodologies, as opposed to the robotic methodologies everybody else uses. You might think that a humanistic approach would involve pinpointing the strengths and weaknesses of your students, and then doing what you can as an intelligent, sensitive and well-trained teacher of your subject to help each student get to where she wants to be. Well, that’s not going to get you onto the seminar circuit, is it? Offer to put teachers in contact with their innermost souls, attempt to convince them that ELT is part caring profession and part Path of Spiritual Unfolding, and you might get a few more bookings. You can help your students to contact and tap their inner whatsit as well. Some ways to do this that I have seen recommended include:

  • Hugs and physical contact.
  • Writing words with the index finger on a partner's back. Partner guesses the word.

Imagine how well this sort of stuff goes down in Muslim countries. If you are thinking that anyone with an ounce of sensitivity would not propose these activities in such an environment, well, it was in Malaysia that a colleague of mine saw TEFL guru Mario Rinvolucri demo the 'back writing' technique. So much for sensitivity. And logic. What's the bloody point of that anyway?

  • Dance, preferably Greek, or anything else that requires holding hands.
  • Composing doggerel.
  • Mime and drama techniques.

Avoid these with your intermediate English for business group, though, or they might just feel you are wasting their time. If you are not a rookie who accepts anything a guru says as gospel, you probably will exercise some judgement here. Still, always remember that as a teacher you are a free bird flying over your imprisoned and stunted fellows, and it is your duty and privilege to (con)descend and untie their wings.

When I was but a trainee on the RSA Dip TEFLA back in nineteen-eighty something, a seminar leader had us sit in a circle, and ‘to emphasise our groupness’, requested each of us in turn to look at the person to our left, and say publicly just what we liked most about that person. Well, the group dynamics were not such as to permit this sort of mutual wanking, and half of us sent up the activity mercilessly, to the irritation of the other half who were inclined to take it seriously. ‘We’re not used to validating one another,’ one nice lady said, in a tone that managed to combine both impatience and forbearance. (Stop it. Spoiling it for others.)

I wished I had been sitting next to the Leader himself, so I could have turned and said ‘y'know, what you’ve just got to love about Jerome is that he’s a pompous, humourless little twerp and quite unrepentant about it,’ but such opportunities are rare in this life.

I started occupying EFL classrooms (cannot call what I did teaching) circa 1982. I did a four week TEFL Certificate course in 1987, and thus initiated, served a year’s apprenticeship in a language school in Cambridge before starting on the year-long in-service Diploma in TEFL. At the end of the diploma course, and at no point before, I felt entitled to call myself newly qualified. Who can be arsed to go through all that any more? Look online and you can find any number of companies offering ‘TEFL weekends’ that claim to equip you with all the skills you will ever need in something like twenty hours. Some of these are taught by young ladies who have a Certificate and three years experience, which today makes them almost venerable. In 2007 I had an interview to become a tutor on such a course, and was invited to observe a TEFL Weekend at a hotel in Leeds before I could teach one on my own. Sigh. I’d taught any number of 20-hour jobs in Greece, although I never claimed they were more than the merest tip-of-the-tongue taste of TEFL - after all, what of lasting value can you learn about anything in 20 hours? If they’d sent me a course outline I could have put it all together in a weekend at home, but they were not to know that. So I went up to Leeds.

The course tutor was a large huggy-bear sort of bloke. He had a large plastic box full of ‘realia’, the toys, balls, food containers, bottles, plastic fruit and veg and other assorted odds and sods that are useful for teaching concrete vocabulary items. I knew exactly what the weekend had in store, and groaned inwardly. I introduced myself and he asked me not to reveal that I was an observer, but to pass myself off as a course participant. Fucking great, I thought – pretending to be a greenhorn for two long days. The thirty or so real participants trooped in, and the tutor began trying to memorise names. I began to feel very anti the whole thing, as these people were going to do voluntary work overseas and EFL was not their main concern. Then the tutor said in his best animateur voice:

‘Right! Now, can we push all the chairs back against the walls, and all the bags to one side, and I want everyone to make seven points of contact with the floor!!!’

‘I’m out of here’ I thought, as people started giggling and trying out various ways of complying with that last command. I grabbed my coat and shot off to the station where I threw myself onto (rather than under) a train home. Yeah, yeah, I know I didn’t really give the course a fair trial, I know the tutor was wholly professional and good at what he was doing, but warm-ups like that just make me freeze over.

I do hope that at some point in those fleeting twenty hours, a little time was devoted to cultural sensitivity. The countries these people had chosen for their service overseas tended to be the poorest and most religiously conservative parts of the developing world. If any bright young Caucasian vivacity fresh off this course thought it was accepted practice to kick off the first lesson by having the students grovel on the floor in front of her, she might not get back to Blighty whole.

Saturday, 14 November 2009

Praise Ye the God of Wood



If you are tempted by internet porn and so fear for your immortal soul, rejoice and be exceeding glad, for help is at hand. We are indebted to the saintly Reverend Ackeroff at Unthinking Anglicans for this good news. Covenant Eyes is a competitively priced software package that will warn you if you are about to open a porn site. The most up-to-date versions will simultaneously cause your laptop to zap six hundred volts through your scrotum. Thus if you notice there is a website called http://www.bollocksandcocks.com/, and are curious as to what it could be (‘Lock Sand Cocks’???) Covenant Eyes will warn you that this is a porn site and then make damn sure you don't enter it, or ever consider entering it thereafter.



Actually no, sorry, it doesn’t. I made all that up. What in fact it does is more sinister. It records all the websites you visit, then e-mails a report every so often to persons of your choosing. You can arrange for your pastor, boss, buddies, students, wife, mother, or anybody you want, to be bombarded with detailed reports of your browsing habits, so they can keep constant tabs on you. This is to keep you pure, or at least contrite.



Honey, I guess I’m kinda disappointed Satan made you visit bull dykes and dildoes again, but only six times this month, so praise the Lord! I really do like so feel privileged that you gifted me with these five-hundred page bulletins every week. See, with God and the software, you can be strong!


Yours in Jesus,


Grandma.


(P.S., hon, for an additional fee, could they make the fonts bigger? I'm getting eye strain. )




With all these people eagerly perusing your surfing reports for mention of bum, tit and dick, praying for you and ticking you off, you are forced to be accountable. Of course you can disable the software any time you'd prefer not to be.



There is a Covenant Eyes blog, ‘Breaking Free’, full of deeply moving stories of how men who couldn’t get enough porn were delivered from their obsession after installing the software for a very reasonable sum, payable monthly. The company aims to grab the consciences and wallets that species of competitive male Christian that sees a man's life as a constant battle between virtue and temptation, and in order to hook such men, it presents us with some heroic, hairy-chested stuff:



‘When I was young, the first time I read the temptation story in Matthew’s Gospel, one clear impression stood out in my mind: this is a showdown; it is like an epic battle of good vs. evil. As I read, it was like watching a gripping movie…’



When you let temptation win, boy, do you feel far away from that male bonding with the Lord!



‘I remember when I was buried deep in porn addiction: it seemed each day was a fight to avoid the inevitable. At the time I didn’t understand why my body would seem to take control. There were so many nights I would walk zombie-like to Internet porn or phone sex in search of my fix.’



The value of the service that Covenant Eyes provides - and at such affordable prices, too - is easily appreciated when we consider the damage done to the hearts and minds of men who develop 'internet Porn Onanistic Disorder', or iPod:


“. . . I didn’t recognize I had an addiction until I had surgery and masturbation wasn’t an option for fifteen days. On day three, I was literally shaking, and I began to connect the dots. Other symptoms: irritability, inability to focus (’staring at walls syndrome’), mood swings, headaches (sometimes quite strong), sense of pressure in my genitals, flashbacks, paranoia, self-defeating thinking, depression, hopelessness, and fear that I will never have sex because I’ve learned no social skills since diving into porn eight years ago as a teen.”

As may easily be concluded from this, indulgence in pornography may lead to outbursts of extreme Drama Queenery, even among the straight. (By the way, Covenant Eyes, staring at walls is not a syndrome, even if you stare at more than one wall.)

The image of sexual desire as a gluttonous beast that will attack unless kept shackled, blinkered and starved is a common one among Christers. The site http://boysunderattack.com/reaching.html ('Reaching for Teenage Boys' - the site owner sounds quite an innocent) aims to reassure adolescent lads on all manner of problems they might encounter when growing up. Bodily changes are dealt with matter-of-factly, but the author sends out such mixed messages on the topic of masturbation that any kid reading this stuff is likely to be seriously confused or, better and more likely, to simply junk the site.



‘It is a balancing act for every male: Every teenage boy has fantasies and lusts and will explore the connection between these, their sexual nature and masturbation…The more frequently you masturbate, the more fantasy you require to get an orgasm each time. [Sez who? You're making this stuff up!] This option becomes a vicious circle - the more you feed your lust, the more it demands to be fed! Ideally, you should aim to delay masturbation until the hormonal pressure builds inside you, then, very little, or ideally, no fantasy at all is required to produce ejaculation!’



That paragraph fills me with the desire to take the writer by the ears and bash his head repeatedly against a concrete floor. It’s OK to pull your cock, BUT you must wait until you can hardly hold back, and then splat, it’s over in seconds and no more pleasurable (though less messy) than a bowel movement. No enjoyment is permitted, or even envisaged, of an activity unique to humans, with their ability to refine their pleasures and cultivate the imagination. No encouragement is given to a young man's exploration of present solitary pleasure and its application to potential joys with a future partner. He is advised to be as cold-blooded and oblivious as a fish squirting sperm into the water.





'Let's see if we can create a few...'

Being an Evangelical Christian must be rather like spending a lifetime holding your breath. Here is one Tim Challies, author of Sexual Detox, a title that immediately gives you some idea of Tim's view of sex.



‘This is the very nature of sin, isn’t it? Sin is always progressive in nature. If you give it an inch, it soon seeks to take a mile. Sin is never content, but always seeks and desires more. Have you ever been scared by your sin? Perhaps there was a time that you saw how a particular sin was taking you over. Maybe you had thought you were in control of your sin but suddenly found that, almost in an instant, it had increased to the next level.’



I often think many problems would disappear if only people would stop talking. To become possessed by demons, you must first believe in the possibility of demonic possession. Once you have been persuaded that jerking off and looking at porn is a sin and an addiction that is taking over your life, you have bought into this discourse and porn sites and Christian sites will work together to feed your guilt for as long as you buy their line. Why not just drop the ‘sin’ nonsense and see porn as an appetizer, a wank as a pleasant work-out for the imagination and the male plumbing, then mop up and go and mow the lawn or finish grouting the bathroom?





Thursday, 12 November 2009

You Ought Never Shoulded To Have Must


EFL teacherly stuff, this. Some of you might want to go and play somewhere else.


I was taking the register with my Algerian group yesterday morning.

'Faisal don't come this morning,' said Cherif. 'He's diseased.'

I took this to mean that Faisal was a trifle indisposed, rather than gangrenous or syphilitic. At first I thought he'd said Faisal was deceased, but this could be discounted a) because of the casual delivery and b) because 'deceased' is not an item of vocabulary I would expect this group to have encountered.

Faisal turned up late explaining he'd had a bout of the shits. He did not put it like that exactly: I think he told me in French. Anyway, he's alive and reasonably well. Someone else had to leave at the break.

‘I go to the bullies,’ he said.
‘The bullies?’
‘Yeah, bullies’ registration.’
‘Ah, police registration, Ok.’

We had to do grammar yesterday. Let us turn our attention, gentlemen, to modal verbs. The primary modal verbs, for those lucky people who need not concern themselves with this sort of thing for a living, are:

CAN, COULD, SHALL, SHOULD, WILL, WOULD, MUST, MAY, MIGHT

Then there's a bunch of hangers-on known as ‘marginal modals’:

OUGHT TO, HAVE TO, NEED, DARE

It might have been Henry Widdowson, Emeritus Professor of Education at the University of London, Professor of Linguistics at the University of Vienna, and quondam Professor of Applied Linguistics at the University of Essex, who said 'modals are a cunt' - or maybe my memory is faulty here. Whoever said it was right, though. This area is a minefield, as every modal verb has several meanings plus a baggage of formal peculiarities that distinguish it from 'normal' – known to their friends as ‘lexical’ - verbs:

He writes / * He musts
He wanted / * He musted
He’s trying / * He’s musting
He doesn’t know / *He doesn’t must
Does he know? / *Does he must?
He won’t tell / *He won’t must

The asterisk denotes an illegal form, and obviously the potential for errors here is considerable, but – and I can’t help thinking this is unfortunate – most of the possible illegal moves remain unmade. You could get such pile-ups as:

*Sorry, I don’t will can to come.
*Teacher, shall we must to write this down?
*Goddammit, I shouldn’t ought to have musted!

But you don’t, in my experience at least, probably because the above manglings are just too complicated semantically. By the time students are ready to consider formulating in English the concept that last sentence attempts to convey, they are experienced enough to know it’s probably more like ‘I shouldn’t have had to’. Pity.

Here is a little taste of the semantic complexity we are dealing with here:

Meanings of ‘can’:


Doris can juggle and ride a monocycle. (Ability)
Can Bertram come to the party? (Permission)
She can be a right old cow sometimes. (Possibility)

Meanings of ‘must’:

Darlings, you must come to Capri this year! (Invitation phrased as an obligation)
I must lose a few pounds. (Obligation)
He must be loaded – look at the car he drives. (Logical deduction based on evidence)

Many a course book in use around the planet presents all modal verbs and all their uses at once, thus guaranteeing that large numbers of students will never sort out the tangle. There is in some countries a view that language learning should be made as difficult as possible, or at least that no attempt need be made to grade, to contextualize, or to demonstrate meaning, rather than endlessly explain it. Talking about English modal verbs in Arabic might give students the feeling that they are really being pretty damn clever, and the teacher who has mastered them can certainly feel very superior, but such learned discourse is not, in most instances, going to produce learners who can actually speak. It’s like sitting in a classroom and talking about driving instead of getting out onto the road. In any case, if you do check understanding of the language you present – by no means a universal habit - you have your hands full making sure that everyone agrees on the differences between ‘permission’ ‘ability’ ‘possibility’, ‘obligation’ and ‘deduction’ and so on, before you even start. That in itself, believe me, is one hell of a task, and I shall never again attempt it, even with the most advanced of groups.

Well, my Wednesday Algerian group is not advanced. We did fine with ‘can’t be’ must be’ and ‘might be’, all presented via a magazine article illustrated with a photo of three attractive young ladies, one of whom says:

‘People think I might be a teacher or a hairdresser. When I tell them I’m a policewoman, they say ‘you can’t be a policewoman! You’re too short!


You see? Some discussion of the text before reading, some guided speculation about the three women’s jobs based on their appearance, to be confirmed or rejected on reading, and the meaning of these verbs is pretty clear without the gales of explanatory hot air many Arab, Greek, Korean, Chinese, Japanese etc., etc., students get from their teachers. You just need to ask a few questions to tidy things up. ‘Are people sure she’s a teacher? How do you know?’

Good! I felt pleased with the progress the students made, and smug for having facilitated it. Such consummate professionalism, such linguistic and pedagogical sensitivity – we adjourned for lunch early as my reward. However, a disinclination to spend lunchtime photocopying instead of going round to Marks and Sparks for fruit, coffee and wine, meant that I didn’t look or think far enough forward in the book, where we get into how you avoid:

* ‘I don’t will can’ and
* ‘I didn’t can’ and
* ’I haven’t could'

by replacing ‘can’ with ‘be able to’ when talking about the future and past. I rashly attempted to present all this, wishing I had not started. It was a lost cause, the students showing signs of acute mental indigestion. A sure sign of failure is when you start getting into explanation mode with students who don’t have the language to follow your explanations, and detecting that this was about to happen, I ditched the bloody modals and had to busk for the remaining ninety minutes, a bloody long time to must, sorry, have to improvise. As ‘tis well said, ‘modals are a cunt’.

I was well pleased with today, though. I have a class of Saudis and Libyans in which the ladies and the gentlemen always sit on opposite sides of the room, the nine ladies all huddled around one table, gassing in Arabic and treating the lesson as if it were the telly in the corner, to watch or ignore as they please. So I decided to rearrange the tables into a horseshoe shape to split up the ‘knitting circle’ as my two colleagues and I have named the ladies’ table. This afternoon we did an activity in which students mill around the room talking to as many people as possible to complete a survey. I suggested Khalid and Abdullah go and talk to the women, and they bravely crossed the imaginary dividing line down the middle of the room and did just that. And before you knew where you were, there were males and females intercoursing all over the place. Great stuff.

*****

Unfortunately, this proved to be rather like the Christmas Truce. Next day, it was business as usual.

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

Soup and Senectitude




People have been making me feel old lately.

The British have long claimed that you may take it as a sign of your advancing years when policemen start to look young. I can’t say I have noticed this particularly, especially as policemen are a relatively rare sight on our streets nowadays, and in any case they are called ‘community support officers’ or something equally polysyllabic and daft. I don’t take much notice of them.

There are other criteria for assessing degree of senility, I have observed. Do you amass supermarket carrier bags, storing them neatly folded or tied into bows in a bag that hangs behind a cupboard door? Do you save plastic yogurt pots, convinced they’ll come in one day, until you have no more room for them, and then throw them out before starting again? Before retiring for the night, do you set the table for breakfast, with the cups upside down on the saucers? If you are male and gay, do you touch up your grey chest hair with ‘Just for Men’ Moustache, Beard and Sideburns colour? I’m not really all that old, and I only engage in one of the activities on this list for the time being, and do you know, it works a treat.

Extreme irascibility around the young is a definite sign that one is well into middle age. This evening on the train, three sixth-form college students were sprawled on the floor of the carriage vestibule. They were bright kids, but Jesus Christ, the grating bloody fucking awfulness of their manner of speech. ‘Say, y’neigh, I’m sort of like this, and say, obviously of course, Megan’s like thaaat, and say like Jack’s like whaaat?’ all delivered in a high-pitched, nasalized yap so infuriating that I was forced to rise and put an end to their pointless young lives. No, I didn’t. That was just a brief wish-fulfillment fantasy. I moved down the train until I could no longer hear them, meaning that I had to walk to the far end of the next carriage and sit next to the bog.

A young colleague, Emma, came out with a surprising criterion for senescence yesterday. She has acquired a blender, and the other day she made some soup.

‘I felt reeeelly old!’ she said.

Baffled, I asked why.

‘You don’t make fucking soup at twenty three!’ she said, as if it were as sure an indicator of decline as a hip replacement op.

‘So when should the urge to make soup come upon one, in the natural course of events?'

‘Well, I’d reckon forty-ish.’

At this point another colleague entered the room.

‘Dave, how old were you when you first made soup in a blender?’ Emma asked him.

‘Forty,’ he said, without a second’s hesitation.

‘There you go!’ Emma said.

Right. Come to think of it, I bought my blender in 2003, at the age of forty-four. It was my second, its predecessor having gone missing in a move some twenty years previously. So although I was obviously a young fogey who made soup back in the eighties, after a soupless interregnum I returned to the activity in the fifth decade, just as Emma’s theory predicts, and thus I am inescapably middle aged.

Sod.

Sunday, 8 November 2009

Of Whupticks and Nunnies



Professor Geoffrey Pullum over at Language Log links to this article about kids, Lego, and the human need to have names for all objects in the immediate environment. If a specific Lego shape has no hitherto agreed-upon name that you know of, you can give it one: ‘one of those four-er flat hinge-y bits’ will designate it perfectly well.

Reading this reminded me of my niece when she was two. If she lacked the word for an object or action, she simply coined one. Once, when she was sitting on the floor poking holes into a lump of plasticine with a drum stick, she told me ‘this is a chommer.’

‘What do you do with a chommer?’ I asked

Dumb question. ‘I chom fings wiv it,’ she said, indulgently.

On another occasion she had invented a mode of progression involving linking the hands behind the knees, descending into a squat, and from this position, leaping forwards across the dining room. This is easy when you are two.

‘I’m whupticking’ she said. ‘Mummy, you whuptick over there, and I’ll whuptick over here.’

Another little girl of my acquaintance, who always had her Linus blanket trailing behind her, had a habit of rubbing all four of its satin edges in rotation over her mouth and nose. This was especially necessary if the blanket had been washed or replaced. ‘I’ve nunnied it now,’ she’d say, on completion of the process. The blanket was now impregnated with her essence, among other things, and thus truly hers.

I had a private vocabulary as a kid, now largely forgotten, probably because it was never spoken aloud. There’s a smell, one that develops in those noisy party blow-outs after they get a bit damp with saliva, and I must have been about five when I christened this smell ‘min’. It is instantly recognisable to me still as the smell of a sneeze or certain damp, plastic kiddies’ bath toys. It also explains my dislike of the name ‘Minnie’ as a diminutive of Jasmine, unfortunately applied to another little kid I know.

Anyway. In January I shall probably be forced to listen yet again to Greeks telling me how the boorish nations of the north (and the Albanians, that barbarian breed of criminal Untermenschen) ‘stole’ words from Greek because the concepts enshrined in those words would otherwise be inexpressible and inaccessible to them. I shall have a go at presenting this evidence from children’s linguistic creativity in support of the view that concepts must exist first or there would be no need for language at all. Language does not shape your mind, your mind shapes language, and some people are simply better equipped than others to mould it, regardless of ethnicity.



Friday, 6 November 2009

Oral Lex



My lower intermediate group had little oral tests today. Each student was asked a few questions about their home town, present studies, leisure activities and plans for the weekend. It’s incredibly frustrating for an adult, articulate in his native language, to be reduced to stumbling through a five minute interview on topics of such mind-numbing banality, and until informed otherwise, most of them thought they had loused it up. In fact, they all did very well. The very things that they think show ineptitude – paraphrasing, coining new words when the right one escapes them, self-correcting – all these are perfectly serviceable strategies for the circumstances, and much to be encouraged. The point at this stage is not to wow the interlocutor with eloquence, since obviously you cannot aspire to this, but merely to assemble more or less the right words, and in the right order near as fuck it. Everyone succeeded, and I take my hat off to them. I take my hat off to me and my two colleagues as well, ‘cos they couldn’t have done it without us.

Before the tests, we did a little work on the /p/ phoneme, non-existent in Arabic. Most Arabic speakers substitute /b/ for /p/, and thus go on Fridays to the mosque to bray, and take strolls in the bark at the weekend. I asked Jamal what he had planned for Saturday. He was going with ferrends for drink any coffee, he said, and afferter was attending some event the bark.

‘What’s happening in the park?’ I asked.

‘This weekend it’s the Porn Fair’ he said.

A Porn Fair in the park, and a good Saudi boy openly announcing his intention to visit it? I don’t think so. I had to request clarification.

‘Yeah, Porn Fair. You know this week, fiffeth Noffember, it’s was be Porn Fair Night, right?’

Gotcha. Now this is in fact an excellent example of progress, although if Jamal knew what he’d said I doubt if he’d think so. Just possibly because of our earlier work on the /p/ /b/ contrast, he’d managed to produce the /p/ phoneme in word initial position bossibly, I peg your bardon, possibly for the first time. OK, so it wasn’t the right phoneme for this occasion, but what the hell, next time it may be, and that’s how you improve.

*****

For non-Brits: the 5th November is ‘Bonfire Night’, celebrated with fires and fireworks.

Apologies to all for the ghastly post title.

Wednesday, 4 November 2009

The Diva Goes Down




My Libyan Diva nabbed me in the corridor yesterday morning to plead with me to allow her back to my group after it was decided she should move to a lower one. She had spent one day in the lower group, and the demotion had caused her great mental and spiritual anguish, it seems.

‘Oh, yesterday, I go my house, and I very cry!’ she wailed.

It was tempting to say ‘no, listen, yesterday I went home, and I cried a lot’, but I have always told trainee teachers to react first to what students say and not how they say it. If a student says ‘sorry for late, I am had an accident of car’ the humane instructor delays pointing out that the Present Perfect is not formed with ‘to be’ as its auxiliary. So, on hearing that The Diva went her house and very cried, I offered sympathetic noises, which she drowned out with more pleading and promises to try harder.

‘All my friend, it’s be this class!’ Well, yeah, it’s a sort of ladies’ social occasion at the moment with loads of Arabic chit-chat and a little English chucked in when anyone can be bothered. I wonder they don't bring their jewellery to polish. This is going to get stamped on big time, darling, believe you me.

‘I came back, I make very try! This down class, it's very sad to me.’

Her manner recalled that of the beggars in I used to see in Greece who would climb aboard the intercity buses just before departure and spiel tales of heartbreaking privation, disease and bereavement before passing the hat round. It was not what you expect from an adult at a university - well, not my idea of appropriate adult behaviour at a university, but I'm beginning to see I'm a bit old-fashioned.

Just as I was running out of kind noises and reasoned arguments against her suit, the course director came by, and La Lybienne began to work on her as well. Now, colleagues of mine have had their knuckles rapped for expressing impatience to students who give them the sort of asinine prattle I had just been giving ear to: ‘they are paying customers, you know!’ but the director just said ‘your level is lower intermediate, you need to be in a lower intermediate group, I don’t want to hear any more about it.’ There. No messing. I should have said that ten minutes before, but would probably have got bollocked for it.

Now look again at these:

‘Oh, yesterday, I go my house, and I very cry!
‘All my friend, it’s be this class!’
‘I came back, I make very try!’


This lady, back in her home country is – wait for it – a teacher of English. I am still puzzling over a phrase in an essay she wrote the other week: ‘My husband is blow away, but I very love he.’ If anyone can make sense of that, answers on a post-card, please. I have already considered, and dismissed, the possibilities that he had a violent outburst of temper, that he was a victim of a terrorist outrage, or that he farted in bed.

Tuesday, 27 October 2009

This Terrible Quality



It was I think Alberto Moravia (and if it wasn’t, it was someone else) who said ‘the Mediterranean woman has this terrible quality’. He did not mean British terrible - a suet-bummed, lycra-clad slattern with black roots and panda eyes. He meant rather that she is implacable, jealous, unforgiving of insult and merciless in exacting revenge for infidelity. Right. Well. This story doesn’t pack in quite that level of drama, so apologies for leading you on.

Maryam of Tunisia was asked by my colleague if she would like to form a group in class with two young men from Brazil. She refused, stating baldly in front of these two perfectly nice lads that she wanted absolutely nothing to do with them. She was not being procured for a threesome, you must understand, merely being asked to collaborate on the drafting of an essay. These two were foreign and male, though, and this was a combination Maryam could not endure. Admittedly Luis often wore a T-Shirt bearing the legend ‘Something for the Ladies’ with an arrow pointing to his groin, but still. My colleague did not force the issue, but noted that Maryam sat fuming for the remainder of his session and seemed especially affronted when he allowed the two Brazilians to crack a few jokes, none of them at Maryam’s expense. She simply disapproved of levity in class, especially from blokes.

The following day Maryam accosted me to complain about David’s lesson, which she said had not profited her as much as it might have. He had not eggzerblained well, she said, and this was bad, ferry bad.

‘Did you ask him to?’ I said.

‘No! Teacher should know! Teacher should know!’

I pointed out that teachers are not psychic, and that this is adult education and therefore a degree of responsibility must be assumed by the student for her own learning. This did not go down well.

‘I am honest berson!’ she said. ‘Alwayce I speak the true. This is bad, teacher must know if student is no understand!’ And here she did the whole bit with the defiantly flashing eyes and the arrogantly jutting chin, something I thought people only did in trashy books. I told her she was complaining to the wrong man, and observed to see if her eyes would become mere slits, but here she left the room, ‘swep’ out in a flurry o’ petticoats, she did’ as queens say, imperiously summoned a huff and went off in it.

Maryam took her custom to another school, and from its principal I heard that she had taken to complaining of headaches and lassitude, which she said were caused by her room mate, who injected her with poisons, potions and simples as she slept. Clever room mate. I suspect quite a few people had entertained thoughts of doing exactly that.

When a colleague e-mailed me the other day to say that one of our students, a lady from Libya, had thrown a tantrum and stalked out of the class when it was suggested she might benefit from going to a lower level, I remembered Maryam. Just what we need in Group Three, I thought; a Carmen, a Cleopatra, to stir things up a bit just when they were going too smoothly. However, the lady in question cooled down and returned, put aside her indignation and took instead to the most repellent obsequiousness, stroking my colleague’s face and telling her how lovely she was, in the hope that this would put out of her mind all thoughts of sending her to a lowlier group. All goes to show how wrong you can be. We’ll see how she frames, and by Friday we’ll decide whether she stays or goes.

Some cultures are so lacking in pragmatism when it comes to which level of class they are assigned, on the basis of a placement test. It is a complete waste of a student’s time and money to be in a class that is beyond her level, but so many need to be gently persuaded of that, often over quite a time. Why the hell can’t they just see it?

*****

I told our Libyan Diva on Friday that come Monday, she should move to another group. I had prepared myself for some strop, but she acquiesced meekly. It is noticeable that these ladies tend to lay on the drama more with other women than they do with men. This may be the result of centuries of masculine indifference to their wishes, although I hope in this case it is the recognition that we are insisting on this entirely for her benefit.

One of our Saudi ladies actually wants to go down a level. She sent her husband to see the course director to apprise her of the fact. It did not occur to her that this is rather like deciding you need an eye test, then sending someone else to the optician’s.

*****

That wasn’t a very long break from blogging, was it?

Sunday, 25 October 2009

Down for Maintainance


 
I'm taking a break from blogging. I've completely dried up for the time being. Please don't go away, though. I shall rise and blog again!

Wednesday, 21 October 2009

Imagine...



Acceptable attire for male teachers.

Imagine a culture in which it is the custom for male teachers to strip to their underpants and socks before entering a classroom. Nobody born into this society bats an eyelid at a near-naked man solemnly announcing the lesson aims, because they have been accustomed to the sight since infant school. Imagine that you are a teacher visiting this country on an exchange. How readily will you fall in with the local custom? Will you stay dressed and endure the impatience of your underpanted colleagues, and your students who wonder why you want to stand out and what you might have to hide, or will you just shuck down and get on with the lesson?

I’ve been thinking about this since the start of the present course three weeks ago. I have a number of veiled Saudi ladies in my group. I cannot see their facial expressions and so cannot easily tell if they are happy or sad, confused or confident, smiling or fuming. One wears jam-jar thick glasses, and communicating with her is rather like talking to a neighbour peering through the letter-box. They have to endure the muggy classroom, heavy colds and hard work in a foreign language whilst draped in yards of ugly steel-grey or mud-brown cloth. The Saudi men of course have no such discomfort or disfigurement to endure. They wear smart casual, they take off their jackets and shoes if it gets hot, laugh and joke, and generally enjoy a sense of smug masculine entitlement.

Yesterday for a little bit of a lark we played noughts and crosses for vocabulary revision. The teacher draws a noughts and crosses grid on the board with a number in each square. The class is divided into two teams, Os, and Xs. The first team to play chooses a square, and is given a definition for which they must provide the right word to get their O or X in the square. This goes on until one team gets a line, or until deadlock. Inevitably the teams were men against women, and unfortunately the men won and congratulated themselves most heartily on a victory they saw as a foregone conclusion. This was just a trivial little divertissement in a long lesson, but their expectation of the inevitable superiority of male performance keeps on cropping up as the year progresses, in presentations, essay writing, study skills, the whole shoot.

It is exasperating to teach a class that will not integrate. Despite repeated attempts on our part to encourage mixing and elicit more contributions from the women, nothing will induce them to work with the men, so it is rather like having two classes in the one room. The women’s reaction to our attempts to get them to interact with males - they simply freeze - is what got me onto the fantasy of a culture where blokes teach in their jockey shorts. I know I’d resist the practice to the hilt, for it would go against every idea I hold of appropriate behaviour for the cirumstances. This is why I have stopped trying to integrate the two halves of the room, imagining that the women feel in my class much as I would in the scenario with the underwear. I just hope that with time they may begin to meld naturally. Such a change is not unprecedented. I had a Saudi lady last year who refused to play the modest maid with eyes downcast, and she shot down every opinion she disagreed with and called out every bloke who patronised the women. With time the men grew to respect her. I’m not holding my breath, however, as Abra was a one-off.

Here are a few quotes from a muslim website as a taste of the ideas that have formed these students:

  •  Beware of mingling with women.
  •  Women should not speak with men, except with a mahram (relative)
  •  A woman is an object of concealment, thus when she emerges, Satan surreptitiously pursues her.
  •  Every eye is a fornicator.
  •  Allah curses the one who looks (at females) and the one to whom the look was directed.
  •  No man is alone with a woman but the Shaytaan will be the third one present.

There. Lust is everywhere, ready to destroy you the second you give it way. 

*****

Like so many religious prohibitions, these beliefs are like bars, bolts and padlocks securing an empty room. Just let them go, and nothing will happen. Religious rules remind me of a cartoon strip reproduced in Steven Pinker’s The Stuff of Thought. A little space alien visiting earth is walking along a street when he comes to a STOP sign. So he stops. For several frames we see him standing obediently at the sign, as the sky gets darker and night falls. Eventually the little alien’s earthling friend finds him:

‘Oh, there you are… Come on, let’s go!’

‘What do you take me for?’ says the alien. ‘Some sort of rebel?’

*****

A propos of very little, nutcase article here.

Monday, 12 October 2009

Don't Stand so Close to Me



Don’t come too close, I have a lurgy. Probably not swine flu, as my temperature is not high enough for that, but it is a pretty swinish cold, and as long as it persists it will cost me £112 per day in lost hours. If I worked alone in an office I would go in, but you cannot maintain any teacherly dignity if your eyes are like currants, your voice sounds like that of Mercedes McCambridge doing the demon in The Exorcist and you splatter what looks like a whole beaten egg over your shirt front each time you sneeze. You aren’t eating, are you?

Saturday, 10 October 2009

Memoirs of a Teacher Trainer II



It is arranged. I’m going to Athens for a week in January to do some input sessions on a Diploma course and to observe some teaching practices, or TPs, as they are imaginatively known. I observed hundreds of TPs in Athens in the nineties and early noughties. It is getting on for eight years since my last one, though, and I am out of the loop a bit. I have been thinking of TPs past, and wondering if the standard will be higher or lower now that diploma candidates are fewer than they used to be. I have long since misplaced my file marked ‘TP reports’, illustrated with doodled cartoons of exploding wigwams (think about it) so I only have memories to go on.

The teachers on our courses all taught in the private institutions known in Greece as ‘frontistiria’. The dull, grinding, prescriptive, deeply conservative Greek state education system is held in comprehensive contempt, and most kids attend frontistiria after school to benefit from the greater amount of individual attention their smaller classes provide. Few teachers have any specific EFL qualifications, however, and the teaching quality ranges from brilliant to abysmal, often in the same institution. Most frontistiria that teach languages offer French and German as well as English, but eavesdropping outside the classrooms, you will often be hard put to know which language is being taught, as you hear nothing but Greek from within.

So, as a TP tutor about to observe a teacher doing her first practical, you arrive at the frontistirio in some far-flung corner of Athens or Piraeus, and make yourself known to the owner or the secretary, who as often as not will make you coffee and treat you with almost embarrassing deference. You find your cheek muscles go into spasms from smiling humbly and being self-deprecating. You probably come across as a smarmy git. There are occasions when the school owner will quite pointedly not make you coffee, or even speak to you. Then you know that the teacher is doing her TPs at this school only under sufferance, and the owner is suspicious of foreign interference and new-fangledness.

The teacher emerges from her previous lesson, looking flustered, and hands you her lesson plan, which you peruse without allowing your fixed smile to slip for a moment. Even when part of the procedure says ‘teacher writes girl, prince and prick’ on the board, understand that this is to get the kids to think of the Sleeping Beauty story, and don’t snicker. The teacher may have devised some True/False questions for a reading text. One such question that I have never forgotten was ‘Boys don’t like to study, they prefer kicking their balls’. This is not the moment to draw attention to such gaffes.



In the classroom your presence will naturally disrupt the normal routines of the group. Some kids are scared to death, hypothesising some unannounced test is toward, but most are fascinated by the foreigner in their midst. Once when I had inserted my carcase painfully into one of the narrow desk and bench arrangements at the back of the room, a boy turned to me and whispered ‘eísaste pragmatikós ánglos?’ ‘are you a real Englishman?’. On another occasion five little Albanian boys subjected me to a barrage of questions before the lesson began. They wanted to know, inter alia, how far I could count, which basketball team I supported and what my zodiac sign was. They were flabbergasted and horrified to learn that my mum and dad lived in another country. One group of tiny kids, no more than five or six, spent most of the lesson surreptitiously whispering questions at me, mostly ‘how do you say X in English?’

‘How do you say fengari in English?’ one asked.

‘Moon’, I said.

‘Moon’ is so close in sound to the Greek word for ‘cunt’ that the answer produced shocked silence and no further questions.

All my colleagues had stories of crackpot rules imposed on teachers by frontistirio owners. More than one had CCTV in the classrooms to allow her to spy on the lessons and intervene if the proceedings were not to her liking. Several forbade the use of any kind of visual aid as a means of teaching vocabulary, and one even discouraged the use of the whiteboard. One colleague was shown into a classroom full of study chairs that all faced different directions, as if they had been deposited by a tidal wave. The students entered and picked their way through the maze, seating themselves without moving the chairs, and the lesson proceeded with students facing all points of the compass. Afterwards the teacher explained that the owner did not want the chairs in rows, or better, a semi-circle, because the students might copy one another’s work. Why these batty rules? Search me. I think in most cases the owners inflicted them simply because they could.

As you observe the lesson, you make notes for feedback and complete a form on which you award grades for a variety of language-teacherly skills. Among these is the ability to use mime, gesture and facial expression. Many an EFL teacher of my acquaintance is an ex-performer of some description. I sometimes think the profession is a repository for frustrated or clapped-out hams; being big and theatrical in front of an audience comes naturally to many of us. But just as many Greek teachers had a mistrust of visual aids, so many were reluctant in the extreme to employ mime, gesture and facial expression to convey meaning, which to me is rather like blind-folding your students. One poor woman, who was not naturally theatrical in manner, suffered in observed lessons. Pirouetting and waving her arms about, with no obvious significance to her extravagant mudras, Smaro gave you the impression that you were watching a video with the image out of synch with the sound. I should have told her just to forget the gesture bit, but I didn’t, because Smaro’s pained corybantics became something to look forward to. As the year went on, she developed a style so rococo that the kids were made dizzy and my notes unintelligible.

Before you leave, you have a brief confab with the teacher, whom you should leave feeling fairly happy, even if things were so desperate you have to resort to praising her handwriting or choice of eye-shadow to do so. The good news is that it is often good news, though. I was just leading into the post-lesson elicitation of the teacher's assessment of how matters had chugged along when Zoe, on her final TP, said ‘come on, cut the crap, tell me the grade!’ and I said it was a Distinction.

‘Aaaaaahhhhhhhhhh!!!! Can I kiss you?!?!’ she said, and smacked one on me.

The feedback was ditched, because she immediately went into the office to phone her mum. So I am hoping for at least one such success story in January, and I’m glad I have something to look forward to through the English winter gloom.
*****
ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ...



Greek education then and now. In both cartoons the irate father is saying 'what sort of marks do you call these, then???' but note how the context changes! Thanks to Maria the Mediterranean Kiwi for the link.

LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin